Kajian Linguistik Terhadap Lafaz Khair, Thoyyib, dan Hasan dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Imam Al-Baidhowi Tafsir Tanwir At-Tanzil Wa Asrar Fi Ta’wil

Azhar Majid Prasetyo; Ahmad Zuhri

doi:10.37364/jireh.v7i2.491

Azhar Majid Prasetyo Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Ahmad Zuhri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37364/jireh.v7i2.491

Keywords: Al-Baidhowi, hasan, khair, linguistics, thayyib

Abstract

The Qur’an, as the word of Allah, holds a central position in Islamic teachings and functions as a timeless source of law. A crucial aspect of interpretation lies in the linguistic analysis of words that may appear similar in translation but differ in semantic meaning, such as khair, ṭayyib, and ḥasan. This study aims to examine the semantic differences among these three terms based on the Tafsīr Tanwīr at-Tanzīl by Imam al-Bayḍāwī. Employing a qualitative approach with semantic analysis as its method, the study also incorporates data triangulation and methodological techniques to ensure the validity of its findings. The results indicate that al-Bayḍāwī provides a rich and contextual interpretation: khair is defined as goodness encompassing both material and spiritual dimensions; ṭayyib is understood as something good both outwardly and inwardly, aligning with the principles of lawfulness and blessing; while ḥasan refers to a form of goodness that includes aesthetic, moral, and spiritual values. These findings highlight the importance of linguistic approaches in Qur’anic interpretation and demonstrate al-Bayḍāwī’s significant contribution to the expansion of Islamic scholarship through a holistic exegetical methodology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akkuş, M. (2019). A note on language contact: Laz language in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(4), 856–860. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917703458

Al-Baidhowi, I. (2000a). Tafsir Anwar At-Tanzil Wa Asrar Fi Ta’wil Jilid I (2000th ed.). Jami’ul Huquq Mahfuzhah Lidarir Rasyidi.

Al-Baidhowi, I. (2000b). Tafsir Anwar At-Tanzil Wa Asrar Fi Ta’wil Jilid II (2000th ed.). Jami’ul Huquq Mahfuzhah Lidarir Rasyidi.

Bozhedonova, A. E. (2020). Semantics of achromatic color indications in epic texts (comparative analysis based on the texts of the Yakut, Altai, Khakas epics). Eposovedenie, 2020-September(3), 107–117. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.25587/k4197-4798-2737-o

Büyük, E. (2019). Tafsir-ta’wil distinction of maturidi and an evaluation of its practical value in ta’wilat. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 23(1), 213–232. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.520370

Büyük, E. (2020). The Nature of the Science of Tafsīrin the Sharhs and Hāshiyahs Written on An wār a- Tanzīl. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 24(3), 1039–1058. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.690206

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.

Darmawan, K. D. (2024). Makna Lafaz Thayyib, Khair, Ma’Ruf, Ihsan Dan Shalih Dalam Al-Quran. Tashdiq: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Dakwah, 2(2), 51–72.

Demir, A. (2023). Traces of Ahl al-Bayt in Shahristānī’s Tafsir, Mafātīh al-Asrār. Hitit Theology Journal, 22(1), 392–422. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14395/hid.1243817

Fahimah, S. (2021). Geliat Penafsiran Kontemporer: Kajian Multi Pendekatan. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 2(1).

Ghufron, A., & Tohir, M. (2023). Infiltrasi Ilmu Kalam dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Safwah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 3(1).

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1991). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Oxford University Press.

Hilmi, A. B. A., Yakub, M., Yusoff, Z. M., & Amir, S. (2020). Pengajian Tafsir Al-Quran: Sorotan Aliran Klasik dan Moden. Sains Insani, 5(1).

Huda, M. N. (2022). Kajian Kitab Tafsir At-Tanwir Majelis Tarjih Dan Tajdid Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah (Qs. Al-Baqarah [2]; 1-5). Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id, 1–5.

Jamarudin, A. (2011). Tafsir Al-Baidlawi: Kitab Induk di Antara Berbagai Kitab Tafsir ( Jurnal Ushuluddin Vol. XVII No. 1, Januari 2011. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 17(1), 66–79.

Kridalaksana, H. (1989). Pembentukan kata dalam bahasa Indonesia. Gramedia.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620614

Mazarchuk, A. V. (2017). Common lexis for headgears and adornments in Khalkha, Buryat, and Kalmyk. Oriental Studies, 34(6), 94–102. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2017-34-6-94-102

Mohamad, S., Usman, A. H., Saad, M. F. A. M., Kadir, M. N. A., & Ali, M. A. M. (2015). The rules of interpretation: How do Al-Qirā’āt applied in Shihab’s exegesis? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1S1), 97–104. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1s1p97

Mubarak, H. (2018). Change through continuity: A case study of Q. 4:34 in Ibn cAshur’s al-Tarir wa’l-Tanwir. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 20(1), 1–27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2018.0318

Muchammad, A. (2021). Tafsir: Pengertian, dasar, dan urgensinya. SCHOLASTICA : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 3(2), 108.

Mun’im, R. Q. M. (2023). Sumbangan Muhammad Abdel Haleem dalam Pengajian Tafsir Al-Quran. ProQuest Dissertations.

Muzakki, fauzan ra’if. (2020). Konsep Makanan Halal Dan Thayyib Terhadap Kesehatan Dalam Al-Qur’an (Analisis Kajian Tafsir Tematik ). Skripsi, 1, 1–89.

Naqash, G. N. (2025). Maṭlab al-Ṭālibīn: A Milestone in the Development of Tafsīr Literature in Kashmir. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 26(1), 217–240. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v26i1.5640

Pallades, V. V. (2022). SEX-RELATED INVECTIVES IN THE ARABIC LANGUAGE. Vostok (Oriens), 2022(5), 181–196. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086919080021540-1

Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. https://philpapers.org/rec/PALS-3

Rahmawati, R., Arifin, S. S., & Yunus, B. M. (2023). Selayang Pandang Tafsir Aqo’idi. Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 4(1).

Salim Said Daulay, D. (2023). Pengenalan Al-Quran. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(Mi), 472–480.

Saylan, N. (2018). Examination of the recitations to Ali in Al-Tabarsi commentary. Turk Kulturu ve Haci Bektas Veli - Arastirma Dergisi, 87, 9–22. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31624/tkhbvd.2018.10

Shah, M. (2013). Al-Tabarī and the dynamics of tafsīr: Theological dimensions of a legacy. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 15(2), 83–139. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2013.0097

Shonhaji, M. T. (2019). Antropologi Budaya Jawa Dalam Kitab Tafsir Al-Qur’an Berbahasa Jawa Karya Kh. Bisri Mustofa. Al-Adyan:Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, 14(2).

Sicak, A. S. (2019). Tafannun (stylistic variation) in similar meanings and utterances in the Quran. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 23(2), 739–763. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.598291

Syamimi Mohd, N., Hussin, H., & Nasyrudin Wan Abdullah, W. (2014). Scientific exegesis in Malay Qur’anic commentary. Asian Social Science, 10(10), 236–242. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n10p236

Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2010). Enhancing cohesion in second language writing: A study of thai graduate students’ expository compositions. International Journal of Learning, 17(7), 33–46. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v17i07/47162

Ünsal, H. (2022). Claims of the Caliphate of Abu Bakr in Ta’wīlāt al-Qur’an by Abu Mansur Al-Maturidi. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 23(2), 311–324. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v23i2.3642

Usman, A. H., Fattah, M., Amin, M. F. M., Abdullah, W. N. W., Othman, F. M., & Kadir, M. N. A. (2015). The rules of interpretation: How do al-‘ām and al-khāş applied in Shihab’s exegesis? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4S1), 523–532. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p523