Analisis Linguistik Frasa Roh Kudus dalam Rumusan Trinitas: Bapa, Anak, dan Roh Kudus

  • Reinhard Mauritz Nelwan Universitas Advent Indonesia Bandung
  • Alvyn Cesarianto Hendriks Universitas Advent Indonesia Bandung
Keywords: linguistic analysis, holy spirit, trinity

Abstract

This study analyses the phrase ‘Holy Spirit’ in the formulation of the Trinity (‘Father, Son, and Holy Spirit’) through a linguistic approach, especially semantics and pragmatics, by referring to the New Testament texts. The research method used is qualitative with a literature observation strategy using the theory of Linguistic Purism. The study results indicate that the term 'Holy Spirit' (γίoυ Πνεύματος) is neuter-gendered (Greek) or feminine-masculine (Hebrew), unlike other terms denoting the Godhead, which are exclusively male. The use of the neuter pronoun (ατό) in John 14:17 and the depiction of the Spirit as part of Christ (Revelation 5:6) reinforce that the Holy Spirit is not distinct, but rather a manifestation of the Spirit of God/Christ. The Trinitarian clause in 1 John 5:7 is not found in pre-16th century manuscripts, suggesting it is an interpolation to support the doctrine of the Trinity. The statement of the Trinity in Matthew 28:19 is regarded as a potential post-Nicene insertion, given that New Testament baptisms only invoke the name of Jesus (Acts 2:38; 19:5). Nonetheless, even if the verse holds validity, the constative concept within Illocutionary Acts elucidates pragmatically that the Holy Spirit is not the third person of the Trinity, but rather the Spirit of God or the Spirit of Christ Himself. This discovery differs from conventional interpretations and presents a more linguistic viewpoint, which is not used as the basic foundation for the formation of the doctrine of the Trinity in Christianity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernard, David K. (2023). The Oneness of God Vol. 1. Word Aflame Press.

Bible Apps.com. 1 John 5 - Barnes' Notes. Diakses pada 2 April 2025, dari https://bibleapps.com/barnes/1_john/5.htm

Bible Hub. 2 Corinthians 13 - Barnes' Notes. Diakses pada 6 April 2025, dari

https://biblehub.com/commentaries/barnes/2_corinthians/13.htm

Bible Hub. 907. Baptizó. Diakses pada 1 April 2025, dari https://biblehub.com/greek/907.htm

Bolker, Joan. (1998). Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day. Owl Books.

Chesnut, Glenn F. (1986). The first Christian histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius. Mercer University Press. Discipleship. HarperOne.

Firman. (2018). “Analisis Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif.” Researchgate.net.

Fiveable. Intro to semantics and pragmatics review; key term - Constatives vs Performatives. Diakses pada 2 April 2025, dari https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-semantics-pragmatics/constatives-vs-performatives

Fromkin, Victoria, dkk. (2017). An Introduction to Language. 11th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage

Learning.

Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Griffith, Sidney H. (2015). The Bible in Arabic: The Scriptures of the "People of the Book" in the Language of Islam. Princeton University Press.

Jones, Russell. (2008) Loan-Words in Indonesian and Malay. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Lang, J. Stephen. (1999). 1,001 things you always wanted to know about the Holy Spirit.

Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers.

Maier, Paul L. (2007). Eusebius: The Church History. Kregel Academic.

Metzler, David. (2001). Jesus. Review and Herald Pub. Association.

Nelwan, Reinhard M. (2010). Linguistic Investigation of Two Debated Terms in Christianity: ‘Baptism’ and ‘Sabbath’. Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Pelita Harapan, 2010. Database (10120060030)

Pintauli, Rolyana F. (2023). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Panduan Lengkap, Tips, Trik, Teknik, Praktik. Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Saunders, Mark N.K., dkk. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Higher Ed.

Smyth, Herbert Weir. (1956). Greek Grammar (Revised by Gordon M. Messing). Cambridge:

Harvard University Press.

StudyLight.org. 2 Timothy 1 - Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers. Diakses pada 2 April 2025, dari https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/ebc/2-timothy-1.html

StudyLight.org. John 14 - Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible - Bible Commentaries. Diakses

pada 7 Nov 2023, dari https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/bnb/john-14.html

Sutoyo, Daniel. (2011). “Peran Roh Kudus Dalam Pemberitaan Injil.” Jurnal Antusias STT Intheos Surakarta (1 September): 1-20.

The Online Greek Bible. 2 Corinthians 13. Diakses pada 6 April 2025, dari

https://www.greekbible.com/2-corinthians/13

Timoner, Rachel. (2011). Breath of Life: God as Spirit in Judaism. Brewster: Paraclete Press.

Velardo, Leandro J. (2020). “Glimpses of the Spirit” A Brief Linguistic Reflection on the

Divine Person of the Holy Spirit. Biblical Research Institute.

Wenham, J.W. (1987). Bahasa Yunani Koine – The Elements of New Testament Greek. Malang: Seminari Alkitab Asia Tenggara.

Willard, Dallas. (2014). The Great Omission: Reclaiming Jesus's Essential Teachings on Discipleship. HarperOne.

Winger, Michael. (2016). “The Meaning of Πνεῦμα in the Letters of Paul: A Linguistic

Analysis of Sense and Reference,” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly Vol. 78, No. 4.

Published
2025-04-27
How to Cite
Nelwan, Reinhard, and Alvyn Hendriks. “Analisis Linguistik Frasa Roh Kudus Dalam Rumusan Trinitas: Bapa, Anak, Dan Roh Kudus”. Jurnal Ilmiah Religiosity Entity Humanity (JIREH) 7, no. 1 (April 27, 2025): 101-115. Accessed September 10, 2025. https://ojs-jireh.org/index.php/jireh/article/view/391.
Abstract viewed = 384 times
PDF downloaded = 209 times