The Relationship Between Women and Men in the Qur'an: A Structural Critical Analysis by Levi-Strauss

  • Khoirun Niat Institut Ilmu Al Qur’an An Nur Yogyakarta
Keywords: levi-strauss's structuralism, the relationship between women and men, the Qur'an

Abstract

This study applies Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralist methodology to analyze Qur'anic narratives featuring women and their male counterparts, examining 42 female figures across 28 stories from 15 surahs to reveal an equilateral triangular deep structure defined by three invariant mythemes: complementarity (e.g., awwā’-Ādam functional synergy), substitution (e.g., Hājar's autonomous replacement of Ibrāhīm; Maryam's parthenogenetic child-rearing), and opposition (e.g., Āsiyah-Pharaoh tauīd/taghu tension). Employing qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology with syntagmatic-paradigmatic decomposition—systematic extraction from Uthmānic recension via Tafsīr al-Jalālain, emic binary opposition identification, etic bundle analysis, and Proppian morphology—the research uncovers non-hierarchical gender dynamics manifesting wadat maudū‘iyyah as tawīd microcosm, where women exhibit full relational agency transcending patriarchal determinism. Findings challenge traditional tafsīr, affirming equilateral narrative weight across vectors and supporting contextual reinterpretation of qawwāmūn (QS 4:34). Methodological rigor includes intercoder reliability, thick description validation across qirā'āt, and commutative testing for structural invariance. Implications extend to computational themes tylometry, maqāid al-sharī‘ah gender exegesis, and comparative Abrahamic mythology, enriching contemporary Islamic feminist discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, I. Q. (2023). Keadilan Relasi Gender dalam Tekstualitas Al-Qur’an Perspektif Nur Rofiah. Universitas PTIQ Jakarta.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. ibn J. (1988). The History of al-Ṭabarī Vol. 6: Muḥammad at Mecca. State University of New York Press.

Alalwani, R. T. (2020). Name of Book: What Prophet Muhammad Offered to Humanity. Akpınar Huzur Yay. Dağ. Paz. Tic. Ltd. Şti.

Alhassen, Z., & Yassine, M. M. (2017). To Tell What the Eye Beholds: A Post 1945 Transnational History of Afro-Arab “Solidarity Politics.” University of Southern California.

Ali, K. (2016). Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and Jurisprudence. One Word Publications.

Andika, M. (2018). Reinterpretasi Ayat Gender dalam Memahami Relasi Laki-Laki dan Perempuan (Sebuah Kajian Kontekstual dalam Penafsiran). Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 17(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2018.172.137-152

Az-Zamakhsyari, M. bin U. (1998). Tafsir Al-Kassyaf. Maktabah al-Ubaikan.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.

Even-Nur, A. (2021). How to Live Different Deaths: Withdrawals from Abrahamic Kinship in Mahmoud Darwish and Dahlia Ravikovitch. Comparative Literature Studies, 58(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.58.2.0340

Firdayanti, N., Mustofa, T. A., & Khair, N. S. H. (2023). Gender Equality in the Perspective of the Qur’an. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic and Muhammadiyah Studies (ICIMS 2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-102-9_13

Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). Judging Passions: Moral Emotions in Persons and Groups. Psychology Press.

Hasan, A. (2020). Decoding the Egalitarianism of the Qur’an: Retrieving Lost Voices on Gender. Lexington Books.

Hastrup, K. (2022). Claude Lévi-Strauss. Revisiting Structuralism in Anthropology. In Structuralism as One–Structuralism as Many. Royal Academy.

Ibn Kaṡīr, I. (1999). Tafsīr Al-Qurān Al-Aẓīm. Dār at-Ṭībah.

Ibrahim, C. (2020). Women and Gender in the Qur’an. Oxford University Press.

Karim, F. R. (2021). Gender Relations in the Qur’ān: Theoretical Foundations and Underlying Ethos [SOAS University of London]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25501/SOAS.00036125

Khalifah, I. A. (n.d.). At-Tafsir At-Tahlili Li Surat an-Nisa. Universitas Al-Azhar Press.

Kurni, W., Anwar, H., & Febriani, N. A. (2023). Relasi Gender dan Tranformasi Sosial Perspektif al-Qur’an. Alashriyyah, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53038/alashriyyah.v9i2.175

Lamrabet, A. (2016). Women in the Qur’an: an Emancipatory Reading. Imak Offset.

Martiani, D. (2017). Persepsi Kalangan Pesantren Terhadap Relasi Perempuan dan Laki-laki (Studi di Jawa Timur dan Jawa Tengah). Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v8i1.1253

Mawdudi, S. A. A. (2006). Four Key Concepts of the Qur’an. Islamic Foundation.

Niat, K. (2023). Struktur Surat-Surat Alif-Lam-Mim Dalam Al-Quran. Istana Agency.

Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Barnes, T. D. (2021). Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ramsey, G. M. (2007). In Search of an Authentic Self: The Rhetorical Construction of Evangelical Women’s Faith Experience. Southern Illinois University.

Shuayb, F. (2012). ’Who’s Better than God to Rule?’—An Inquiry into the Formation of the First Islamic State (622–32 CE). University of California.

Stetkevych, S. P. (2014). The Snake in the Tree in Abu al-ʿAlaʾ al-Maʿarri’s Epistle of Forgiveness: Critical Essay and Translation. Journal of Arabic Literature, 45(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1570064x-12341276

Ṭanṭāwi, M. S. (1987). At-Tafsīr Al-Wasīṭ Li Al-Qurān Al-Karīm. Ar-Risalah Press.

Verskin, S. (2017). Barren Women: The Intersection of Biology, Medicine, and Religion in the Treatment of Infertile Women in the Medieval Middle East. Princeton University.

Yusoff, M. F. B. M. (2023). Tracing the Tracts of Qaṣaṣ: Towards a Theory of Narrative Pedagogy in Islamic Education. Religions, 14(10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14101299

Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Niat, Khoirun. “The Relationship Between Women and Men in the Qur’an: A Structural Critical Analysis by Levi-Strauss”. Jurnal Ilmiah Religiosity Entity Humanity (JIREH) 6, no. 2 (December 30, 2024): 391-401. Accessed February 6, 2026. https://ojs-jireh.org/index.php/jireh/article/view/368.
Abstract viewed = 78 times
PDF downloaded = 42 times